Hi Ian, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:20:58AM +0000, Ian Lartey wrote: > On 02/03/13 19:35, Grant Likely wrote: > >On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:09:47 +0530, Laxman Dewangan <ldewan...@nvidia.com> > >wrote: > >>On Friday 01 March 2013 10:36 PM, Ian Lartey wrote: > >>>Palmas charger has 16 GPIOs > >>>add palmas_gpio_[read|write|update] api to take account > >>>second bank of GPIOs > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <i...@slimlogic.co.uk> > >>>Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <g...@slimlogic.co.uk> > >>>--- > >> > >>Looks good. > >>Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewan...@nvidia.com> > >> > > > >Applied for v3.10, thanks. > > > >g. > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > Hello Grant, > > For this [v2] patch I missed out that this patch depends on > "[PATCH v2] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers." > I did have this noted in the first version of this patch - sorry. > > kbuild rightly complained about the patch > > Do you want to revert this patch until the > "mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers" > is also accepted ? You should send your patches as independent patchsets, to be applied in the right order. I'll ack the MFD patches and Grant could take both.
Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
