> > ---
> >  drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c     |    3 ++-
> >  drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethtool.c |    6 ++++++
> >  drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h     |    4 ++--
> >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c
> > b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c
> > index 4aad350..bfc5898 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c
> > @@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ vmxnet3_probe_device(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >                                 (int)num_online_cpus());
> >     else
> >  #endif
> > -           num_rx_queues = 1;
> > +   num_rx_queues = 1;
> 
> Why are you un-indenting this else branch?  Please don't do that
> 

Just to annoy you :) [Sorry, couldn't resist.]

I'm sorry I didn't notice I was breaking the indent of the else branch. For 
some reason checkpatch didn't complain.

While at it, I'm also changing the netdev_info to netdev_err in 
vmxnet3_ethtool.c.

You didn't explicitly ask for it, so I wasn't sure if I should repost the 
patch. I'm going to repost it any way and leave it up to you on which patch you 
want to apply.

Thanks.

- Bhavesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to