minor nit.
$subject
s/Correct/Fix
On Monday 11 March 2013 10:35 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> The driver tries to round up the specified timeout cycles to
> the next power of 2 value. But this is done wrongly.
> Correcting this here.
>
Change needs to be improved here. See below.
> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvu...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/memory/emif.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/emif.c b/drivers/memory/emif.c
> index df08736..622638c 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/emif.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/emif.c
> @@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ static u32 get_pwr_mgmt_ctrl(u32 freq, struct emif_data
> *emif, u32 ip_rev)
> if (timeout < 16) {
> timeout = 0;
> } else {
> - timeout = __fls(timeout) - 3;
> if (timeout & (timeout - 1))
So from the change, it appears that, the timeout
check for power of 2 should be done before updating
the variable which seems to be the right fix.
> - timeout++;
> + timeout <<= 1;
> + timeout = __fls(timeout) - 3;
> }
>
> switch (lpmode) {
>
So just make changelog verbose as well as add a
comment about the calculation in the code.
Otherwise, patch looks fine to me.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@ti.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
