* Linus Torvalds ([email protected]) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That said, the patch definitely looks like the right thing to do. I'll > > apply it. > > Hmm. I applied it, and then pretty much immediately realized what was > problematic about it. What about the fs/bio.c one? This all felt like > it was still a work-in-progress, and I'm not sure if you had more > comments or patches coming along? > > Anyway, this particular patch got applied. Does that obviate the need > for the fs/bio.c one? I didn't follow all the call-chains...
The fs/bio.c issue is unrelated to this patch, so that separate issue still stands. I did not get any feedback on that private RFC though. Should I repost it CCing lkml ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
