On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 15:16 -0500, Steve French wrote: > I would like to merge the three we have (one still has to be put in > for-next - the one from Jeff) for for-next in the next three or fouir > days - but I can create another temporary branch for the ones for 3.10 > - but ... I would like to simplify things by merging the other cleanup > patches we already have first. I agree that we are going to have to > let people know to rebase everything for cifs for 3.10 on this big > cleanup patch.
Another possibility is to extend the cifs_dbg(type, fmt. ...) types from VFS, FYI, NOISY so that the messages could be filtered/classified better. Also, perhaps it'd be better to use pr_debug instead of KERN_ERR for the VFS messages. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
