Hi Rob,
Le 25/03/2013 14:59, Rob Herring a écrit :
> On 03/25/2013 08:30 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
>> index be71782..805d704 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
>> ranges;
>>
>> intc: interrupt-controller@01c20400 {
>> - compatible = "allwinner,sunxi-ic";
>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-ic";
>
> Generally speaking, this is a bad thing to do. This breaks compatibility
> between dtb and kernel versions. If that breakage is not yet a concern
> for sunxi, then it is okay.
Yes, I know, but I thought it was okay since sunxi has never been in an
usable state, and it seemed odd to me to begin to maintain an history
for a platform that has never actually been booted by a user.
On the other end, if someone speaks up, I'd be happy to keep the old
compatible around as well.
> Also, I don't see any documentation updates for any of these changes.
Ah, yes, my bad.
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
