On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another "fixes" pull-request for AT91 on top of material that you have already
> taken. Fixes are manly typos but the bad node declaration and some misspelling
> can cause confusion.
Hi Nicolas,
I'd prefer to take only fixes for serious bugs into 3.9 now, since I have
already sent the fixes for -rc5. As far as I can tell, the macb node patch
is the only one that falls into that category, but for that one, I'd
prefer if it could be redone in a simpler way, by replacing
+ ahb {
+ apb {
+ macb0: ethernet@f802c000 {
+ phy-mode = "rmii";
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+ };
+ };
with
@macb0 {
phy-mode = "rmii";
status = "okay";
}
as there is no need to provide the full path when you already have
a label for the device.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
