On 03/28/2013 09:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> + if (machine_desc->init_irq) >>> + machine_desc->init_irq(); >>> + else >>> + irqchip_init(); >> >> There needs to be an empty version defined for !OF. > > Better: > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > if (!machine_desc->init_irq) > irqchip_init(); > else > #endif
Or the new style: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !machine_desc->init_irq) irqchip_init(); else That needs the empty version, but handles your case. Rob > machine_desc->init_irq(); > > which means we don't even get the test if !OF, and if someone mistakenly > sets this to NULL for a !OF platform, they get to know about it. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/