On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:08:23PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
> 28/03/2013 (Thu 19:00) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > 2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>:
> > > > [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
> > > > 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
> > > >> > nohz_extended_mask);
> > > >> > + pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n",
> > > >> > nohz_ext_buf);
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending
> > > >> anything
> > > >> experimental to Linus: we'll send something that is tested and that we
> > > >> expect to not break anything. (and which we'll fix if it does)
> > > >
> > > > In that case, should we vector a patch through PaulM to clobber these
> > > > too?
> > > >
> > > > $ git grep xperiment |grep rcu
> > > > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: printk(KERN_INFO "\tExperimental boot-time
> > > > adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n", rcu_fanout_leaf);
> >
> > This one has been this way for quite some time. I must confess that I am
> > more inclined to remove this Kconfig option entirely than I am to remove
> > the "Experimental". ;-)
> >
> > > > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental no-CBs CPUs: %s.\n",
> > > > nocb_buf);
> > > > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental polled no-CBs
> > > > CPUs.\n");
> > >
> > > Hehe, that's indeed what I inspired from ;-)
> >
> > I guess we can rerun the earlier "how to mark Kconfig options as not
> > yet being ready for 100 million unsuspecting victims^Wusers. ;-)
>
> Perhaps consider "hiding" these kinds of choices behind CONFIG_EXPERT ?
We tried that with CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (or something like that), and
what happened was that all distros eventually enabled CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
But if I was -really- serious about keeping the testing population down,
I would take Matthew Garret's advice and force a splat during boot-up.
So I now have a commit for 3.11 queued to remove the "Experimental"
from these strings, with your Reported-by.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
