> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
> > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field.  So
> > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
> 
> Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I
> decided to not add a bool false setting for the structure field given
> that the assumption is this would not be something dynamic, and data
> structure would be kzalloc()'d so by default they are 0.

What do you do about the test, though?

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to