On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:04:06 -0400 Neil Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:53:08AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:29:38PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > (Note: compile-tested only) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Neil Horman <[email protected]> > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > --- > > > net/sctp/associola.c | 16 ++-------------- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > I don't see anything wrong with this patch per-se, but the idr_alloc_cyclic > > call > > isn't integrated with net/net-next or Linus' tree yet. If we don't gate > > this > > patch on that integration, we'll break the build. > > Neil > > > Actually, I just noticed that you only sent us 6/6 here, I'm assuming a prior > patch in the series adds the idr_alloc_cyclic code? if so, I've seen the > prior > version Yes, idr_alloc_cyclic is added in patch #1. v2 has some slight changes from v1 but it's essentially the same concept. > > Acked-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]> > Thanks! -- Jeff Layton <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
