Hi, Mark,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yang, Wenyou
> Sent: 2013年4月2日 13:50
> To: 'Mark Brown'
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Ferre, Nicolas; Lin, JM;
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 03/14] spi/spi-atmel: add physical base address
> 
> Hi, Mark,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Brown [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 2013年4月1日 21:42
> > To: Yang, Wenyou
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; Ferre, Nicolas; Lin, JM;
> > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/14] spi/spi-atmel: add physical base address
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 03:43:36PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> >
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> > > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct atmel_spi_caps {  struct atmel_spi {
> > >   spinlock_t              lock;
> > >
> > > + resource_size_t         phybase;
> > >   void __iomem            *regs;
> > >   int                     irq;
> > >   struct clk              *clk;
> >
> > This looks like the wrong type?
> 
I got it, you are right, you mean It should be used " phys_addr_t " type.

        phys_addr_t     phybase;

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang.

> I double checked.
> 
> The type ' resource_size_t ' is defined in include/linux/ types.h as below,
> 
> typedef phys_addr_t resource_size_t;
> 
> I think it is OK.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Wenyou Yang
N�Р骒r��y����b�X�肚�v�^�)藓{.n�+�伐�{��赙zXФ�≤�}��财�z�&j:+v�����赙zZ+��+zf"�h���~����i���z��wア�?�ㄨ��&�)撷f��^j谦y�m��@A�a囤�
0鹅h���i

Reply via email to