On 04/08/2013 06:54 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> I think it is a good idea to switch directly to strtobool. But anyway, if you >> don't want to respin the patch it is fine as it is. > I didn't know that strtobool() existed ... but now that I do I agree that it > would > be better to use it here. But ... I'm less comfortable updating the patch to > use > it. User visible behavior would change (currently just "1" is considered > "true", > but strtobool would also accept "y" and "Y"). I'd also have to think hard > about > what to do if strtobool() said the input was not a valid boolean. > > Thanks for the review. > > -Tony I'll take the patch as is. If anyone wants to do the strtobool conversion as a follow up that would be great as well. As a staging driver which doesn't terribly closely correspond to any standard abi's I'd be inclined to not worry to much about breaking userspace code that relies on the exact comparison currently used as long as the obvious case still works.
Patch applied to togreg branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/