On 04/10/2013 10:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:57:25PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:+void acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip) +{ + acpi_handle handle; + acpi_status status; + struct list_head *evt_pins; + struct acpi_gpio_evt_pin *evt_pin, *ep; + + if (!chip->dev || !chip->to_irq) + return; + + handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->dev); + if (!handle) + return; + + status = acpi_get_data(handle, acpi_gpio_evt_dh, (void **)&evt_pins); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return; + + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(evt_pin, ep, evt_pins, node) { + devm_free_irq(chip->dev, evt_pin->irq, evt_pin);How about using normal request/free_irq() functions for both _EVT and non-_EVT events? Since we now need to call acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() anyway, I don't see the point using devm_* functions here.
Then we need to create a list of non-_EVT events, or add them to the evt_pins list.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
