On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 09:30 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On 13-04-2013 19:46, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:44:00AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:02:21AM -0600, Jake Edge wrote: > >>> Hi Zhang Rui, > >>> > >>> The problem reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/4/428 (and > >>> incorrectly attributed to a suspend patch by me here: > >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/12/314) still exists in 3.9-rc6, at least > >>> for my HP/Compaq 2510p laptop. It appeared that some folks were seeing > >>> some improvement with earlier 3.9-rcs (?) but I just tested rc6 and saw > >>> substantially the same behavior. This all works fine in <= 3.6.11. > >>> > >>> A brief recap: after resuming, the fan on the laptop spins up to full > >>> speed and stays there. "temp6" in "acpitz-virtual-0" (as shown by > >>> "sensors") is 100°C and stays there, which is presumably what is making > >>> the fan stay on. > >> > >> My HP Compaq NC6000 exhibits slightly different behaviour. For me the > >> reported temp is always accurate but the trip points get out of sync > >> with the actual temperature. > >> > >> With 3.7 I saw two different kinds of problems coming out of resume. > >> In one case the fan stays on until the temp rises high enough to get the > >> trip points back into sync. In the other case the fan goes off, and stays > >> off even when the temperature rises above the highest active trip point, > >> but it does appear to get back into sync when the temp starts to come back > >> down. I think the difference might stem from resuming when the laptop has > >> cooled down fully vs. when it's still warm. > >> > >> I also just tried 3.9-rc6, and that one appears to behave differently > >> to 3.7, but still wrong. There the fan goes off after resume, and comes > >> back on as the temperature rises, but it never slows back down after > >> that. > >> > >> I'll try to collect some more detailed dumps of all three cases. > > > > I filed a new bug and attached all my logs: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56591 > > > > > Rui, does this one gets fixed with your series to make the parts of > thermal framework to be glued together in a single module?
No. > Or does this > one is a new bug? > right, it is a new bug. thanks, rui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/