On 2013/4/15 22:15, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> From: libin <huawei.li...@huawei.com>
> 
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
> it?
> 

yes, I think this patch should be applied to the 3.8-stable tree. Thanks.
Libin

> ------------------
> 
> From: "libin <huawei.li...@huawei.com>"
> 
> commit fd9b86d37a600488dbd80fe60cca46b822bff1cd upstream
> 
> Commit 201c373e8e ("sched/debug: Limit sd->*_idx range on
> sysctl") was an incomplete bug fix.
> 
> This patch fixes sd->*_idx limit range to [0 ~ CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX-1]
> avoiding array overflow caused by setting sd->*_idx to CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX
> on sysctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Libin <huawei.li...@huawei.com>
> Cc: <jiang....@huawei.com>
> Cc: <guohan...@huawei.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51626610.2040...@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.c...@samsung.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 26058d0..112a32a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4948,7 +4948,7 @@ static void sd_free_ctl_entry(struct ctl_table **tablep)
>  }
>  
>  static int min_load_idx = 0;
> -static int max_load_idx = CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX;
> +static int max_load_idx = CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX-1;
>  
>  static void
>  set_table_entry(struct ctl_table *entry,
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to