On Tue, 1 May 2001 00:43:42 +0200 (CEST),
Kai Germaschewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I sent this to the kbuild list about a week ago, and I received exactly
>zero replies, so I'm posting to l-k now. This may mean that the idea is
>totally stupid (but I'd like to know) or unquestionably good (that's what
>I'd prefer :), well, maybe I'll get some feedback this time.
The patch appears to work but is it worth applying now? The existing
2.4 rules work fine and the entire kbuild system will be rewritten for
2.5, including the case you identified here. It struck me as a decent
change but for no benefit and, given that the 2.4 kbuild system is so
fragile, why not live with something we know works until 2.5 is
available?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
