>>>>> " " == Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Ion Badulescu wrote:
>> I'll do another test, 2.2.18 + the NFS/SunRPC changes, and see
>> how it goes. Hopefully they'll apply easily...
> As I suspected, 2.2.18 + all the NFS/NFSd/SunRPC changes
> present in 2.2.19pre10 locks up with wait_on_bh as soon as I
> run ls -lR on a large NFS directory tree, while at the same
> time pummeling the network and the local disks.
> NFS is not enough to trigger the bug, the extra disk/network
> stress *is* necessary. The network stress actually seems to be
> enough, I just triggered the bug again...
> 2.2.18 vanilla is fine.
> So I guess the next round is in Trond's court. :-)
Did you apply the following patch which I put out on the lists a
couple of weeks ago?
Cheers,
Trond
--- net/sunrpc/xprt.c.orig Sun Mar 25 18:37:42 2001
+++ net/sunrpc/xprt.c Wed Apr 18 11:10:21 2001
@@ -1145,9 +1145,11 @@
unsigned long oldflags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
xprt->snd_task = NULL;
- if (!rpc_wake_up_next(&xprt->sending) && xprt->stream)
+ if (!rpc_wake_up_next(&xprt->sending) && xprt->stream) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
xprt_add_tcp_timer(xprt, RPCXPRT_TIMEOUT);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
+ } else
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
}
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
