On 04/18/2013 04:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >>> This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the >>> at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which >>> may or may not be the right solution. If it is not, >>> maybe someone could provide a better fix. >> >> Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix >> with proper RAM type. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> >> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> >> >> What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this >> patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc >> tree? > > I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree. > > Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now. > >>> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Andrew Victor <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Albin Tonnerre <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> >> >> Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to >> move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each >> other? > > Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on > top of his other patches?
Well, as Daniel's patches are still under construction, I stack this one on the at91-3.10-soc branch and let Daniel rebase his work on top of a 3.10-rc1-ish tree... Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
