On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> wrote: > Hey, > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 06:10:57AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> Ping. > > Sorry, I've been at collab summit / lsf. Plus, it's a bit too late > for for-3.10 anyway. Anyways, after glancing over it, here are my > preliminary thoughts. The first one looks good but I'm not sure about > dropping nr_running adjustment. The only real benefit coming from > that is dropping a sched callback and if there's any performance / > overhead impact, I'm afraid it's gonna be negative. There are actual > benefits in using as few tasks as possible -
waking_up() callback doesn't win too much in this. > the cache footprint gets smaller, cache footprint also be reduced in different way in the patchset. and memory atomic operations are reduced. > so unless there's a clear indication that the suggested Only simple. and remove the optimization from rare cases. > behavior is better in some way, I'm not sure what we're buying with > the proposed changes. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
