On Monday 22 April 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> There is no sensible reason why #dma-cells shouldn't be allowed to be 0. It is
> completely up to the DMA controller how many additional parameters, besides
> the
> phandle, it needs to identify a channel. E.g. for DMA controller with only one
> channel or for DMA controllers which don't have a restriction on which channel
> can be used for which peripheral it completely legitimate to not require any
> additional parameters.
>
> Also fixes the following warning:
> drivers/dma/of-dma.c: In function 'of_dma_controller_register':
> drivers/dma/of-dma.c:67:7: warning: 'nbcells' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
Do you have an example for this? If a dma engine has only one request line,
why would you even use the dmaengine subsystem for it, rather than including
the code to program it in the slave driver?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
