On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bu...@hp.com> wrote: > Hi Michel, > > On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 03:54 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: >> These patches extend Alex Shi's work (which added write lock stealing >> on the rwsem slow path) in order to provide rwsem write lock stealing >> on the fast path (that is, without taking the rwsem's wait_lock). >> >> I initially sent a shorter series shortly before v3.9, however some >> patches were doing too much at once which made them confusing to >> review. I have now split the series at a smaller granularity; >> hope this will help :) > > Coincidentally, I was doing some similar work with similar results. But > I have to say I like your series and cleanups better than mine :) > > I've run a few tests on this patchset and I'm pretty happy with the > numbers. The first series of tests were on my quad-core laptop running > pgbench on three different database sizes, each with various number of > clients:
Thanks a lot for this testing. I was getting discouraged with this series, as I would have hoped for it to be picked in -next a long long time ago. Anyway, I will resend a v3 with the (mostly style) updates I got from everyone on v2 and try submitting it to Linus. -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/