On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 14:42 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > There's just too much confusion here for me to touch anything at all,
> > so please fix things up.
> 
> Oh, and you might as well check that I resolved the conflicts in the
> trace pull correctly while you're at it. They looked pretty obvious,
> and it compiles for me, but ..

Almost.

I'll also run my full ftrace test suite on your latest kernel, and see
if it finds anything else.

Please apply:

---
tracing: Fix small merge bug

During the 3.10 merge, a conflict happened and the resolution was
almost, but not quite, correct. An if statement was reversed.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 581630a..ae6fa2d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr, struct 
task_struct *tsk, int cpu)
                return;
 
        WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
-       if (tr->allocated_snapshot) {
+       if (!tr->allocated_snapshot) {
                /* Only the nop tracer should hit this when disabling */
                WARN_ON_ONCE(tr->current_trace != &nop_trace);
                return;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to