3.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Li Fei <[email protected]>

commit f7b0e1055574ce06ab53391263b4e205bf38daf3 upstream.

With the current implementation, kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs_sum is also
increased in case of irq_mis_count increment.

So there is no need to count irq_mis_count in arch_irq_stat,
otherwise irq_mis_count will be counted twice in the sum of
/proc/stat.

Reported-by: Liu Chuansheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Li Fei <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Liu Chuansheng <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366980611.32469.7.camel@fli24-HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-CMT-PC
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c |    4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -165,10 +165,6 @@ u64 arch_irq_stat_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 u64 arch_irq_stat(void)
 {
        u64 sum = atomic_read(&irq_err_count);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
-       sum += atomic_read(&irq_mis_count);
-#endif
        return sum;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to