On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:20:30AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> index 684599b..33e6584 100644
> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> @@ -441,7 +441,8 @@ extern int audit_filter_type(int type);
>  extern int  audit_receive_filter(int type, int pid, int seq,
>                               void *data, size_t datasz, kuid_t loginuid,
>                               u32 sessionid, u32 sid);
> -extern int audit_enabled;
> +#define audit_enabled (init_user_ns.audit.enabled)
> +#define audit_enabled_ns (ns->audit.enabled)
>  #else /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>  static inline __printf(4, 5)
>  void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
> @@ -487,6 +488,7 @@ static inline void audit_set_user_ns(struct 
> user_namespace *ns)
>  static inline void audit_free_user_ns(struct user_namespace *ns)
>  { }
>  #define audit_enabled 0
> +#define audit_enabled_ns(ns) 0

conflicting definitions here. maybe the first one should be
        #define audit_enabled_ns(ns) (ns->audit.enabled)?

> @@ -285,14 +282,15 @@ static int audit_do_config_change(char *function_name, 
> int *to_change,
>                                 u32 sid)
>  {
>       int allow_changes, rc = 0, old = *to_change;
> +     struct user_namespace *ns = current_user_ns();
>  
>       /* check if we are locked */
> -     if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_LOCKED)
> +     if (ns->audit.enabled == AUDIT_LOCKED)

then you don't use the macro you introduced?

> @@ -609,7 +608,7 @@ static int audit_log_common_recv_msg(struct audit_buffer 
> **ab, u16 msg_type,
>       char *ctx = NULL;
>       u32 len;
>  
> -     if (!audit_enabled) {
> +     if (!init_user_ns.audit.enabled) {
>               *ab = NULL;
>               return rc;
>       }

same here

-- 
Aristeu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to