On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote: > From: Petko Manolov <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:17 +0300 (EEST) > > > On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: Petko Manolov <[email protected]> > >> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:09:00 +0300 (EEST) > >> > >> > What about the .c/.h split? > >> > >> I have no strong opinion either way. > > > > OK, so i'll prepare new patch series that coalesce my original patch #1 > > and #2, and apply the Francois suggestion about using the generic > > netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in the interrupt path. > > > > Which tree would you want me to diff against? > > As has been explained to you already, cleanups belong in 'net-next', > bug fixes belong in 'net'. > > If you series has both, you have to submit them separately. Submit > the bug fixes to 'net', then the next time I merge 'net' into 'net-next' > you can submit the cleanups on top against 'net-next'.
Got it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
