On 22.05.2013 01:47, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:44 +0400, Roman Gushchin wrote:
Hi, all!

I think, it's good, but not enough.

We still can't rely on the sk->sk_family field by dereferencing the
inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 field, because we can set the sk_family field to
the PF_INET6 value before setting pinet6 to an appropriate value
(assuming it is NULL just because it was not a PF_INET6 socket in a
previous life).

net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:
static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int
protocol, int kern)
{
        <...>
        err = -ENOBUFS;
        sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_INET6, GFP_KERNEL, answer_prot);
        if (sk == NULL)
                goto out;
        <...>
        sk->sk_destruct              = inet_sock_destruct;
        sk->sk_family                = PF_INET6;
        sk->sk_protocol              = protocol;

        sk->sk_backlog_rcv   = answer->prot->backlog_rcv;

        inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 = np = inet6_sk_generic(sk);
        <...>
}

net/core/sock.c:
struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
                      struct proto *prot)
{
        struct sock *sk;

        sk = sk_prot_alloc(prot, priority | __GFP_ZERO, family);
        if (sk) {
                sk->sk_family = family;
        <...>
}


So, we need to care about setting sk_family to PF_INET6 _strictly_ after
setting the pinet6 field to a valid value (using rcu_assign_pointer(),
for instance).

This can never happen.

A socket cannot be find in a hash chain while pinet6 is not set.

For a given socket pointer sk (say TCP or UDP), pinet6 is a constant and
cannot change. (This is a property of SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU : slab cannot
be merged, so all objects are of the same type)

I missed that.

So the order of writing sk_family / pinet6 is irrelevant.

Agree.

Thank you for clarification!

Regards,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to