On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0500, Kent Yoder wrote: >> >> + notify_remote_via_evtchn(priv->evtchn); >> >> + >> >> + ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6))); >> > >> > Um, + 6? Why? Is there an #define for that magic constant? >> > Should this value be read before you do the wait_for_tpm_stat stuff? >> >> This is hardcoded to 6 even in tpm.c. Time for a #define... >> >> > Otherwise it looks OK to me. Should this go through me or Kent? >> > And if so, is Kent waiting for my feedback? >> >> My comments were minor -- I was expecting feedback on your earlier >> comments before merging. I think this should go through the tpmdd >> maintainer if its going to live in drivers/char/tpm though. > > That is you I thought? > > konrad@phenom:~/mm$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/char/tpm > Kent Yoder <[email protected]> (maintainer:TPM DEVICE DRIVER) > Rajiv Andrade <[email protected]> (maintainer:TPM DEVICE DRIVER) > Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]> (maintainer:TPM DEVICE DRIVER) > Sirrix AG <[email protected]> (maintainer:TPM DEVICE DRIVER) > [email protected] (moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER) > [email protected] (open list)
That was me until today. :-) But I didn't see the response your comments yet. Kent -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
