On 05/30/2013 01:00 AM, Jason Low wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 23:17 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> blocked_load_avg sometime is too heavy and far bigger than runnable load
>> avg. that make balance make wrong decision. So better don't consider it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I have been testing these patches with a Java server workload on an 8
> socket (80 core) box with Hyperthreading enabled, and I have been seeing
> good results with these patches.
>
> When using a 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with patches 1-8, there was about a 40%
> improvement in performance of the workload compared to when using the
> vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with no patches. When using a 3.10-rc2 tip
> kernel with just patches 1-7, the performance improvement of the
> workload over the vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel was about 25%.
>
> Tested-by: Jason Low <jason.l...@hp.com>
>
That is impressive!
Thanks a lot for your testing! Just curious, what the benchmark are you
using? :)
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
