On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 09:35 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 31 May 2013 00:30:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 09:23 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Fri, 31 May 2013 00:06:07 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:37 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > I think most of snd_printd() and snd_printdd() can be kept as is. > > > > > These are just debug messages, after all. > > > > Some of those are emitted at levels other than KERN_DEBUG. > > > > I think that odd. > > > Yeah, they aren't good, but it's a different topic. > > > > Not really, I think it's systemic and fallout from > > accretive implementation rather than design. > > Maybe. > > But you shouldn't mix up with the fix for the missing verbosity and > the fix for wrong KERN_ prefix, at least, in the patch level. They > need to be fixed individually.
I think that's best too. I don't see the complexity/hell in adding functions for specific types of struct * to reduce the complexity of the code though. Centralizing those indirections into functions also generally reduces overall code size. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/