On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Jingoo Han <[email protected]> wrote: > The usage of strict_strtoul() is not preferred, because > strict_strtoul() is obsolete. Thus, kstrtoul() should be > used.
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_show(struct device *dev, struct > device_attribute *attr, > > r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr); > > - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®)) > + if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®)) > return -EINVAL; ret = kstrtoul(...); if (ret) return ret; > @@ -117,8 +117,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_store(struct device *dev, struct > device_attribute *attr, > > r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr); > > - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®) > - || strict_strtoul(buffer, 10, &val)) > + if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®) || kstrtoul(buffer, 10, &val)) > return -EINVAL; I see no harm to allow user to write octal values as well. Thus, just ret = kstrtoul(r->name, 0, ®); if (ret) return ret; Alessandro, what do you think? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

