On Tuesday 04 June 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > so that would create a circular dependency unless we change all of them
> > at once. I did that when creating this patch, but then decided to
> > revert it for now and do smaller steps.
>
> Okay. Changing those 24 should be the next step.
Yes, and we can remove the various 'select USB_ARCH_HAS_*' from arch
code at the same time. Since there is no hurry, I would suggest doing
that after 3.11-rc1 so we don't have to worry about dependencies.
> > We could do
> >
> > config USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD
> > def_bool USB_SUPPORT
> >
> > or
> >
> > config USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD
> > def_bool y
> >
> > which would both have the exact same behavior as 'def_bool HAS_IOMEM'.
>
> I'm in favor of "def_bool y".
Ok. And I'll use 'bool' for the 'USB_ARCH_HAS_?HCI' symbols since we
don't care about the value any more.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
