I think you are right. I will reorder 2/3 and 3/3 with the change you suggested.
Thanks, Stratos Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >On 4 June 2013 20:36, Stratos Karafotis <strat...@semaphore.gr> wrote: >> On 06/04/2013 08:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Should this be done in 3/3 ? >>> >> >> acpi-cpufreq does not use mperf after 2/3. Why should we compile it with >> CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ? >> Do you want me to move the change in 3/3? > >I somehow feel now that 3/3 should come before 2/3 and then this change >should be merged into it. And at the end we can have this patch as 3/3.. > >What do you say? core should go last and users/drivers must go first.
