From: Matthias Schiffer <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:00:52 +0200
> On 05/31/2013 10:42 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Cong Wang <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:23:11 +0800 >> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Matthias Schiffer >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Since some refactoring in 5f5a011, ndisc_send_redirect called >>>> ndisc_fill_redirect_hdr_option on the wrong skb, leading to data >>>> corruption or >>>> in the worst case a panic when the skb_put failed. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Good catch! >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> >> >> I've queued this up for -stable. >> > > I saw that this was marked as 'not applicable' in the patchwork - it > should still be applied to the net tree though. I hope my patch tag > 'net/3.9' didn't cause any confusion, I meant net *and* 3.9. It's in the -stable queue and it will be submitted, don't worry. In this situation it means "not applicable" to net or net-next, sorry for the confusion. The way I work with the "stable" patchwork bundle is I process that queue with state filtering off, so that the patch bundle I end up with has every patch in that queue, regardless of state. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
