On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Zach Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've got an alternate approach for fixing this wart in lookup_ioctx()...
>> Instead of using an rbtree, just use the reserved id in the ring buffer
>> header to index an array pointing the ioctx.  It's not finished yet, and
>> it needs to be tidied up, but is most of the way there.
>
> Yeah, that might work.
>
> Note that the patch wasn't using an rbtree, it was storing the pointer
> value in a *radix* which is why single lookups took so long.  Presumably
> radix was used for RCU lookups.
>
> Your ring->id trick lets us use RCU with small ints instead of the
> context pointer.  It might be worth using idr instead of rolling manual
> array code.  It'd still be much faster than the list, but get rid of the
> large alloc, array walking, memcpy(), etc.
>

I picked up Ben's patch and incorporated Zach's idea and the first
results look promising, as expected. I am going to do a full test with
the same workload I've used for rbtree and come back with the results
and the patch in a day or so.

Thanks everybody !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to