>On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. >> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you >> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. >> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should >> go >> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to >> define >> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree >> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. >> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. >> >> Thanks, best regards, >> >> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: >> >> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 >> 22:40:37 +0200) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt > >Pulled, thanks.
Hi, I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal? Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/