On 06/14/2013 08:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> 
> Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
> and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
> dropped, so drop them.

Please hold on for a moment, I would like to discuss the ATA ACPI
binding with you and Tejun, the current binding with SCSI device tree
doesn't buy us anything but introduced some nasty consequences. I think
we should bind ACPI handle with ATA port/device, I have a draft patch
for this and will send out soon. If we go binding with ATA port/device,
then the two functions will be needed :-)

Thanks,
Aaron

> 
> Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing
> entries from the power_dependent list in struct acpi_device, so drop
> that list and the loop walking it in acpi_power_resume_dependent()
> too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/device_pm.c |   56 
> -----------------------------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/power.c     |    3 --
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c      |    1 
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h  |    7 -----
>  4 files changed, 67 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -308,7 +308,6 @@ struct acpi_device {
>       struct list_head physical_node_list;
>       struct mutex physical_node_lock;
>       DECLARE_BITMAP(physical_node_id_bitmap, ACPI_MAX_PHYSICAL_NODE);
> -     struct list_head power_dependent;
>       void (*remove)(struct acpi_device *);
>  };
>  
> @@ -461,8 +460,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct
>  acpi_status acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *adev,
>                                   acpi_notify_handler handler);
>  int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct device *, int *, int);
> -void acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev);
> -void acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev);
>  #else
>  static inline acpi_status acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *adev,
>                                              acpi_notify_handler handler,
> @@ -482,10 +479,6 @@ static inline int acpi_pm_device_sleep_s
>  
>       return (m >= ACPI_STATE_D0 && m <= ACPI_STATE_D3) ? m : ACPI_STATE_D0;
>  }
> -static inline void acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(acpi_handle handle,
> -                                          struct device *depdev) {}
> -static inline void acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(acpi_handle handle,
> -                                             struct device *depdev) {}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> @@ -994,60 +994,4 @@ void acpi_dev_pm_detach(struct device *d
>       }
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_pm_detach);
> -
> -/**
> - * acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent - Add physical device depending for PM.
> - * @handle: Handle of ACPI device node.
> - * @depdev: Device depending on that node for PM.
> - */
> -void acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev)
> -{
> -     struct acpi_device_physical_node *dep;
> -     struct acpi_device *adev;
> -
> -     if (!depdev || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> -             return;
> -
> -     mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -
> -     list_for_each_entry(dep, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> -             if (dep->dev == depdev)
> -                     goto out;
> -
> -     dep = kzalloc(sizeof(*dep), GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (dep) {
> -             dep->dev = depdev;
> -             list_add_tail(&dep->node, &adev->power_dependent);
> -     }
> -
> - out:
> -     mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent);
> -
> -/**
> - * acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent - Remove physical device depending for PM.
> - * @handle: Handle of ACPI device node.
> - * @depdev: Device depending on that node for PM.
> - */
> -void acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev)
> -{
> -     struct acpi_device_physical_node *dep;
> -     struct acpi_device *adev;
> -
> -     if (!depdev || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> -             return;
> -
> -     mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -
> -     list_for_each_entry(dep, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> -             if (dep->dev == depdev) {
> -                     list_del(&dep->node);
> -                     kfree(dep);
> -                     break;
> -             }
> -
> -     mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/power.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
> @@ -253,9 +253,6 @@ static void acpi_power_resume_dependent(
>       list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node)
>               pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
>  
> -     list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> -             pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
> -
>       mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
>  }
>  
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,6 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->wakeup_list);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->physical_node_list);
>       mutex_init(&device->physical_node_lock);
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->power_dependent);
>  
>       new_bus_id = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_device_bus_id), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!new_bus_id) {
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to