Commit-ID:  e1ebe86203e6532eb5a0ae8f26ccae47aca548ae
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/e1ebe86203e6532eb5a0ae8f26ccae47aca548ae
Author:     Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:50:11 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:58:55 +0200

hw_breakpoint: Simplify list/idx mess in toggle_bp_slot() paths

The enable/disable logic in toggle_bp_slot() is not symmetrical
and imho very confusing. "old_count" in toggle_bp_task_slot() is
actually new_count because this bp was already removed from the
list.

Change toggle_bp_slot() to always call list_add/list_del after
toggle_bp_task_slot(). This way old_idx is task_bp_pinned() and
this entry should be decremented, new_idx is +/-weight and we
need to increment this element. The code/logic looks obvious.

Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.wea...@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155011.ga6...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index ef8ebe5..dee0148 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -185,26 +185,20 @@ fetch_this_slot(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, int weight)
 static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, bool enable,
                                enum bp_type_idx type, int weight)
 {
-       unsigned int *tsk_pinned;
-       int old_count = 0;
-       int old_idx = 0;
-       int idx = 0;
-
-       old_count = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type);
-       old_idx = old_count - 1;
-       idx = old_idx + weight;
-
-       /* tsk_pinned[n] is the number of tasks having n breakpoints */
-       tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned[type], cpu);
-       if (enable) {
-               tsk_pinned[idx]++;
-               if (old_count > 0)
-                       tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
-       } else {
-               tsk_pinned[idx]--;
-               if (old_count > 0)
-                       tsk_pinned[old_idx]++;
-       }
+       /* tsk_pinned[n-1] is the number of tasks having n>0 breakpoints */
+       unsigned int *tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned[type], cpu);
+       int old_idx, new_idx;
+
+       old_idx = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type) - 1;
+       if (enable)
+               new_idx = old_idx + weight;
+       else
+               new_idx = old_idx - weight;
+
+       if (old_idx >= 0)
+               tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
+       if (new_idx >= 0)
+               tsk_pinned[new_idx]++;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -228,10 +222,6 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum 
bp_type_idx type,
        }
 
        /* Pinned counter task profiling */
-
-       if (!enable)
-               list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
-
        if (cpu >= 0) {
                toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, enable, type, weight);
        } else {
@@ -241,6 +231,8 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum 
bp_type_idx type,
 
        if (enable)
                list_add_tail(&bp->hw.bp_list, &bp_task_head);
+       else
+               list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
 }
 
 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to