3.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit faff57a92ba1d7247c5e86ecea2886d2c9d54507 ]

commit fb745e9a037895 ("net/802/mrp: fix possible race condition when
calling mrp_pdu_queue()") introduced a lockdep splat.

[   19.735147] =================================
[   19.735235] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[   19.735324] 3.9.2-build-0063 #4 Not tainted
[   19.735412] ---------------------------------
[   19.735500] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[   19.735592] rmmod/1840 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[   19.735682]  (&(&app->lock)->rlock#2){+.?...}, at: [<f862bb5b>]
mrp_uninit_applicant+0x69/0xba [mrp]

app->lock is normally taken under softirq context, so disable BH to
avoid the splat.

Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ward <[email protected]>
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/802/mrp.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/802/mrp.c
+++ b/net/802/mrp.c
@@ -871,10 +871,10 @@ void mrp_uninit_applicant(struct net_dev
         */
        del_timer_sync(&app->join_timer);
 
-       spin_lock(&app->lock);
+       spin_lock_bh(&app->lock);
        mrp_mad_event(app, MRP_EVENT_TX);
        mrp_pdu_queue(app);
-       spin_unlock(&app->lock);
+       spin_unlock_bh(&app->lock);
 
        mrp_queue_xmit(app);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to