On Tuesday 25 June 2013 22:06, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > In order to define a "sigset_t ksigmask" member, > > > > You do not need it. But the reason is not clear until the cleanup. > > I take this back, this is not as simple as I thought... and perhaps even > not right. > > However. Probably you can replace has_ksigmask + ksigmask by > "sigset_t __user *sigmask" pointer?
This is going to be a PITA because we also need to support the compat syscall, which uses compat_sigset_t*, not sigset_t* :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
