On 06/27/2013 03:35 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel <[email protected]>
Instead of passing multiple bools to timekeeping_updated(), define
flags and use a single 'action' parameter. It is then more obvious
what each timekeeping_update() call does.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index baeeb5c..7aed2b0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
#include "tick-internal.h"
#include "ntp_internal.h"
+#define TK_CLEAR_NTP (1 << 0)
+#define TK_MIRROR (1 << 1)
+
static struct timekeeper timekeeper;
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
static seqcount_t timekeeper_seq;
@@ -241,16 +244,16 @@ int pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier(struct
notifier_block *nb)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier);
/* must hold timekeeper_lock */
-static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, bool clearntp, bool
mirror)
+static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned action)
Nit: Mind making this "unsigned int" just for consistency sake with the
rest of the code?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
