On 27 June 2013 21:25, Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:24:32 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > + if (boost_enabled != state) {
>> > + write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> > + boost_enabled = state;
>> > + if (cpufreq_driver->enable_boost)
>> > + ret = cpufreq_driver->enable_boost(state);
>> > + else
>> > + ret = cpufreq_boost_trigger_state_sw();
>
> I will use only one call to cpufreq_driver->enable_boost(state) [*] with
> either cpufreq_boost_enable_sw() (function with SW boost handling) or
> the one provided by cpufreq driver.
>
> Only when cpufreq driver doesn't provide [*], it will be filled with
> "default" cpufreq_boost_enable_sw().
I didn't get it completely. You are saying you will send a function pointer
now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
