On 06/29/2013 02:51 AM, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> 3.8.13.4 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
> know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Aaron Lu <[email protected]>
> 
> commit 44521527be36172864e6e7a6fba4b66e9aa48e40 upstream.
> 
> Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
> mistakenly dropped the code to register hotplug notificaion handler
> for ATA port/devices, causing regression for people using ATA bay,
> as kernel bug #59871 shows.
> 
> Fix this by adding back the hotplug notification handler registration
> code.  Since this code has to be run once and notification needs to
> be installed on every ATA port/devices handle no matter if there is
> actual device attached, we can't do this in binding time for ATA
> device ACPI handle, as the binding only occurs when a SCSI device is
> created, i.e. there is device attached.  So introduce the
> ata_acpi_hotplug_init() function to loop scan all ATA ACPI handles
> and if it is available, install the notificaion handler for it during
> ATA init time.
> 
> With the ATA ACPI handle binding to SCSI device tree, it is possible
> now that when the SCSI hotplug work removes the SCSI device, the ACPI
> unbind function will find that the corresponding ACPI device has
> already been deleted by dock driver, causing a scaring message like:
> [  128.263966] scsi 4:0:0:0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
> Fix this by waiting for SCSI hotplug task finish in our notificaion
> handler, so that the removal of ACPI device done in ACPI unbind
> function triggered by the removal of SCSI device is run earlier when
> ACPI device is still available.
> 
> [rjw: Rebased]
> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
> Reported-bisected-and-tested-by: Dirk Griesbach <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> [ kamal: backport to 3.8 ]

Cool, thanks for the backport, I should have noticed this change of API.
I'll be more careful next time. BTW, the backport looks good to me.

Thanks,
Aaron

> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |  2 ++
>  drivers/ata/libata.h      |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> index cc8aa9e..4cdeee4 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> @@ -156,8 +156,10 @@ static void ata_acpi_handle_hotplug(struct ata_port *ap, 
> struct ata_device *dev,
>  
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
>  
> -     if (wait)
> +     if (wait) {
>               ata_port_wait_eh(ap);
> +             flush_work(&ap->hotplug_task.work);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  static void ata_acpi_dev_notify_dock(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void 
> *data)
> @@ -214,6 +216,38 @@ static const struct acpi_dock_ops ata_acpi_ap_dock_ops = 
> {
>       .uevent = ata_acpi_ap_uevent,
>  };
>  
> +void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
> +             struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
> +             acpi_handle handle;
> +             struct ata_device *dev;
> +
> +             if (!ap)
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             handle = ata_ap_acpi_handle(ap);
> +             if (handle) {
> +                     /* we might be on a docking station */
> +                     register_hotplug_dock_device(handle,
> +                                                  &ata_acpi_ap_dock_ops, ap);
> +             }
> +
> +             ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ALL) {
> +                     handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(dev);
> +                     if (!handle)
> +                             continue;
> +
> +                     /* we might be on a docking station */
> +                     register_hotplug_dock_device(handle,
> +                                                  &ata_acpi_dev_dock_ops,
> +                                                  dev);
> +             }
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * ata_acpi_dissociate - dissociate ATA host from ACPI objects
>   * @host: target ATA host
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index 3b3afa8..5866bf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -6124,6 +6124,8 @@ int ata_host_register(struct ata_host *host, struct 
> scsi_host_template *sht)
>       if (rc)
>               goto err_tadd;
>  
> +     ata_acpi_hotplug_init(host);
> +
>       /* set cable, sata_spd_limit and report */
>       for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
>               struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
> index 7148a58..15ac13f 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ extern int ata_acpi_register(void);
>  extern void ata_acpi_unregister(void);
>  extern void ata_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev);
>  extern void ata_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev);
> +extern void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host);
>  #else
>  static inline void ata_acpi_dissociate(struct ata_host *host) { }
>  static inline int ata_acpi_on_suspend(struct ata_port *ap) { return 0; }
> @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ static inline int ata_acpi_register(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline void ata_acpi_unregister(void) { }
>  static inline void ata_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev) { }
>  static inline void ata_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev) { }
> +static inline void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host) {}
>  #endif
>  
>  /* libata-scsi.c */
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to