(2013/06/29 3:43), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/28, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 16:27 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> >>> Ah, but this conflicts with the other changes I sent. They have >>> your acks, and iiuc Steven is going to apply them. >> >> I'll see if I can solve any conflicts. I need to get my -rt versions out >> and start on the new 3.6 stable today. Then after that, I plan on going >> though and getting all the tracing patches settled. > > Thanks! > >>> Besides, this fix is not complete afaics, we should also clear >>> TP_FLAG_TRACE/PROFILE if __enable_trace_probe() fails. > > Yes. > > And I forgot to mention, until we fix the races we discuss in another > thread, this WARN_ON() doesn't look right. So perhaps it would be > really better to delay this change a bit.
Agreed, this fix is not a critical one. The racing problem of dynamic events is what we have to solve at first. Thank you! -- Masami HIRAMATSU IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
