On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:27 -0500, Sherry Hurwitz wrote: > For AMD Families 10h ~ 14h Processors > file: amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin > md5sum: 55ae79b82cbfddcf7142058be3c9ec2d > > For AMD Family 15h Processors > file: amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin > md5sum: 122ac7e56442c2b7c28eb26978b2d57c > > Signed-off-by: Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurw...@amd.com> > --- > LICENSE.amd-ucode | 64 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > WHENCE | 9 +++++ > amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin | Bin 0 -> 12684 bytes > amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin | Bin 0 -> 7876 bytes > 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 LICENSE.amd-ucode > create mode 100644 amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin > create mode 100644 amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [...] > --- a/WHENCE > +++ b/WHENCE > @@ -2169,3 +2169,12 @@ File: go7007/wis-startrek.fw > Licence: Redistributable. See LICENCE.go7007_firmware for details > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > + > +Driver: microcode_amd - AMD CPU Microcode Update Driver for Linux > + > +File: amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin > +File: amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin > + > +License: Redistributable. See LICENSE.amd-ucode for details [...]
Please include the version number. I notice that the download page on amd64.org also has GPG signatures. Perhaps those should be included too? (Actually, I would like to see verifiable signatures on all binary firmware, but I don't think that can be made a requirement any time soon. Key 9F94BC90 isn't signed by another published key, so I still have no reason to trust its identity.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
