3.5.7.17 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Jed Davis <[email protected]>

commit c5f927a6f62196226915f12194c9d0df4e2210d7 upstream.

With this change, we no longer lose the innermost entry in the user-mode
part of the call chain.  See also the x86 port, which includes the ip.

It's possible to partially work around this problem by post-processing
the data to use the PERF_SAMPLE_IP value, but this works only if the CPU
wasn't in the kernel when the sample was taken.

Signed-off-by: Jed Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
[ luis: backported to 3.5: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 952a5a7..55790a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, 
struct pt_regs *regs)
        struct frame_tail __user *tail;
 
 
+       perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->ARM_pc);
        tail = (struct frame_tail __user *)regs->ARM_fp - 1;
 
        while ((entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) &&
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to