3.5.7.17 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>

commit 2779db8d37d4b542d9ca2575f5f178dbeaca6c86 upstream.

Commit 02725e7471b8 ('genirq: Use irq_get/put functions'),
inadvertently changed can_request_irq() to return 0 for IRQs that have
no action.  This causes pcibios_lookup_irq() to select only IRQs that
already have an action with IRQF_SHARED set, or to fail if there are
none.  Change can_request_irq() to return 1 for IRQs that have no
action (if the first two conditions are met).

Reported-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <[email protected]> (against 3.2)
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://bugs.debian.org/709647
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index b4c6385..a561ed3 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -554,9 +554,9 @@ int can_request_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned long 
irqflags)
                return 0;
 
        if (irq_settings_can_request(desc)) {
-               if (desc->action)
-                       if (irqflags & desc->action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
-                               canrequest =1;
+               if (!desc->action ||
+                   irqflags & desc->action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
+                       canrequest = 1;
        }
        irq_put_desc_unlock(desc, flags);
        return canrequest;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to