Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok. So your commit message and explanation was pure and utter tripe, > and the real reason you want this is that llvm-mc is broken. > > Please fix llvm-mc instead, ok? If the intent of llvm is to be > compatible with the gnu compiler tools, then it should do that. Plus > the gas behavior is clearly superior, so why not just improve the llvm > toolchain to match those improved semantics?
Yep. I started the discussion on LLVMDev, and posted patches [1]. >From the discussions on the list, many of the devs are claiming that LLVM is "correct" and that linux.git needs to be patched. I'm not taking sides; I just want a solution to the problem. [1]: The archive is broken, but here are some pieces: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130708/180968.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
