On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 06:25:57PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > Nothing in arch/i386/kernel/traps.c uses a task gate, they are all > interrupt, trap, system or call gates. I guarantee that kdb on ix86 > and ia64 uses the same kernel stack as the failing task, the starting > point for the kdb backtrace is itself and it does not follow segment > switches. I would consider this a bug in kdb then. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4... Andrew Morton
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in... Dawson Engler
- RE: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... Dunlap, Randy
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 an... VDA