The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating some dates and statistics.
Also update information pertaining to longterm releases. Here I have intentionally left out any mention of the v2.6.34.x longterm, since I will EOL it before this patch makes it in the v3.12 kernel anyway. Finally, update the links to mmotm and linux-next trees, as neither of them worked and pre-dated the kernel.org server rebuilds. Cc: Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> Cc: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> diff --git a/Documentation/development-process/2.Process b/Documentation/development-process/2.Process index 4823577..0c943a1 100644 --- a/Documentation/development-process/2.Process +++ b/Documentation/development-process/2.Process @@ -14,16 +14,16 @@ The kernel developers use a loosely time-based release process, with a new major kernel release happening every two or three months. The recent release history looks like this: - 2.6.38 March 14, 2011 - 2.6.37 January 4, 2011 - 2.6.36 October 20, 2010 - 2.6.35 August 1, 2010 - 2.6.34 May 15, 2010 - 2.6.33 February 24, 2010 - -Every 2.6.x release is a major kernel release with new features, internal -API changes, and more. A typical 2.6 release can contain nearly 10,000 -changesets with changes to several hundred thousand lines of code. 2.6 is + 3.10 June 30, 2013 + 3.9 April 28, 2013 + 3.8 February 18, 2013 + 3.7 December 10, 2012 + 3.6 September 30, 2012 + 3.5 July 21, 2012 + +Every 3.x release is a major kernel release with new features, internal +API changes, and more. A typical 3.x release can contain over 10,000 +changesets with changes to several hundred thousand lines of code. 3.x is thus the leading edge of Linux kernel development; the kernel uses a rolling development model which is continually integrating major changes. @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ detail later on). The merge window lasts for approximately two weeks. At the end of this time, Linus Torvalds will declare that the window is closed and release the -first of the "rc" kernels. For the kernel which is destined to be 2.6.40, +first of the "rc" kernels. For the kernel which is destined to be 3.12, for example, the release which happens at the end of the merge window will -be called 2.6.40-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to +be tagged v3.12-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to merge new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next kernel has begun. @@ -62,22 +62,21 @@ add at any time). As fixes make their way into the mainline, the patch rate will slow over time. Linus releases new -rc kernels about once a week; a normal series will get up to somewhere between -rc6 and -rc9 before the kernel is -considered to be sufficiently stable and the final 2.6.x release is made. +considered to be sufficiently stable and the final 3.x release is made. At that point the whole process starts over again. -As an example, here is how the 2.6.38 development cycle went (all dates in -2011): +As an example, here is how the 3.10 development cycle went (all dates in +2013): - January 4 2.6.37 stable release - January 18 2.6.38-rc1, merge window closes - January 21 2.6.38-rc2 - February 1 2.6.38-rc3 - February 7 2.6.38-rc4 - February 15 2.6.38-rc5 - February 21 2.6.38-rc6 - March 1 2.6.38-rc7 - March 7 2.6.38-rc8 - March 14 2.6.38 stable release + April 28 3.9 stable release + May 11 3.10-rc1, merge window closes + May 20 3.10-rc2 + May 26 3.10-rc3 + June 2 3.10-rc4 + June 8 3.10-rc5 + June 15 3.10-rc6 + June 22 3.10-rc7 + June 30 3.10 stable release How do the developers decide when to close the development cycle and create the stable release? The most significant metric used is the list of @@ -92,34 +91,41 @@ release is made. In the real world, this kind of perfection is hard to achieve; there are just too many variables in a project of this size. There comes a point where delaying the final release just makes the problem worse; the pile of changes waiting for the next merge window will grow -larger, creating even more regressions the next time around. So most 2.6.x +larger, creating even more regressions the next time around. So most 3.x kernels go out with a handful of known regressions though, hopefully, none of them are serious. Once a stable release is made, its ongoing maintenance is passed off to the "stable team," currently consisting of Greg Kroah-Hartman. The stable team -will release occasional updates to the stable release using the 2.6.x.y +will release occasional updates to the stable release using the 3.x.y numbering scheme. To be considered for an update release, a patch must (1) fix a significant bug, and (2) already be merged into the mainline for the next development kernel. Kernels will typically receive stable updates for a little more than one development cycle past their initial release. So, -for example, the 2.6.36 kernel's history looked like: - - October 10 2.6.36 stable release - November 22 2.6.36.1 - December 9 2.6.36.2 - January 7 2.6.36.3 - February 17 2.6.36.4 - -2.6.36.4 was the final stable update for the 2.6.36 release. +for example, the 3.7 kernel's history (2012/2013) looked like: + + December 10 v3.7 stable release + December 17 v3.7.1 + January 11 v3.7.2 + January 17 v3.7.3 + January 21 v3.7.4 + January 27 v3.7.5 + February 3 v3.7.6 + February 11 v3.7.7 + February 14 v3.7.8 + February 17 v3.7.9 + February 27 v3.7.10 + +3.7.10 was the final stable update for the 3.7 release. Some kernels are designated "long term" kernels; they will receive support for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels and their maintainers are: - 2.6.27 Willy Tarreau (Deep-frozen stable kernel) - 2.6.32 Greg Kroah-Hartman - 2.6.35 Andi Kleen (Embedded flag kernel) + 2.6.32 Willy Tarreau + 3.0 Greg Kroah-Hartman + 3.2 Ben Hutchings + 3.4 Greg Kroah-Hartman The selection of a kernel for long-term support is purely a matter of a maintainer having the need and the time to maintain that release. There @@ -199,8 +205,8 @@ involved. 2.3: HOW PATCHES GET INTO THE KERNEL There is exactly one person who can merge patches into the mainline kernel -repository: Linus Torvalds. But, of the over 9,500 patches which went -into the 2.6.38 kernel, only 112 (around 1.3%) were directly chosen by Linus +repository: Linus Torvalds. But, of the over 13,500 patches which went +into the 3.10 kernel, only 70 (around 0.5%) were directly chosen by Linus himself. The kernel project has long since grown to a size where no single developer could possibly inspect and select every patch unassisted. The way the kernel developers have addressed this growth is through the use of @@ -276,7 +282,7 @@ mainline get there via -mm. The current -mm patch is available in the "mmotm" (-mm of the moment) directory at: - http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ + http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/ Use of the MMOTM tree is likely to be a frustrating experience, though; there is a definite chance that it will not even compile. @@ -287,7 +293,7 @@ the mainline is expected to look like after the next merge window closes. Linux-next trees are announced on the linux-kernel and linux-next mailing lists when they are assembled; they can be downloaded from: - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/ + https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/ Some information about linux-next has been gathered at: -- 1.8.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
